It allows the end user to communicate with the operating system so they can load programs, access files, and accomplish other tasks. The three main types of user interfaces are:
Democracy versus Republic It is important to keep in mind the difference between a Democracy and a Republic, as dissimilar forms of government.
Understanding the difference is essential to comprehension of the fundamentals involved. It should be noted, in passing, that use of the word Democracy as meaning merely the popular type of government--that is, featuring genuinely free elections by the people periodically--is not helpful in discussing, as here, the difference between alternative and dissimilar forms of a popular government: This double meaning of Democracy--a popular-type government in general, as well as a specific form of popular government--needs to be made clear in any discussion, or writing, regarding this subject, for the sake of sound understanding.
These two forms of government: Democracy and Republic, are not only dissimilar but antithetical, reflecting the sharp contrast between a The Majority Unlimited, in a Democracy, lacking any legal safeguard of the rights of The Individual and The Minority, and b The Majority Limited, in a Republic under a written Constitution safeguarding the rights of The Individual and The Minority; as we shall now see.
A Democracy The chief characteristic and distinguishing feature of a Democracy is: Rule by Omnipotent Majority. In a Democracy, The Individual, and any group of Individuals composing any Minority, have no protection against the unlimited power of The Majority.
It is a case of Majority-over-Man. This is true whether it be a Direct Democracy, or a Representative Democracy.
In the direct type, applicable only to a small number of people as in the little city-states of ancient Greece, or in a New England town-meeting, all of the electorate assemble to debate and decide all government questions, and all decisions are reached by a majority vote of at least half-plus-one.
This opens the door to unlimited Tyranny-by-Majority. This was what The Framers of the United States Constitution meant inin debates in the Federal framing Convention, when they condemned the "excesses of democracy" and abuses under any Democracy of the unalienable rights of The Individual by The Majority.
Examples were provided in the immediate post years by the legislatures of some of the States. In reaction against earlier royal tyranny, which had been exercised through oppressions by royal governors and judges of the new State governments, while the legislatures acted as if they were virtually omnipotent.
There were no effective State Constitutions to limit the legislatures because most State governments were operating under mere Acts of their respective legislatures which were mislabelled "Constitutions. Connecticut and Rhode Island continued under their old Charters for many years.
It was not until that the first genuine Republic through constitutionally limited government, was adopted by Massachusetts--next New Hampshire inother States later.
It was in this connection that Jefferson, in his "Notes On The State of Virginia" written inprotected against such excesses by the Virginia Legislature in the years following the Declaration of Independence, saying: He also denounced the despotic concentration of power in the Virginia Legislature, under the so-called "Constitution"--in reality a mere Act of that body: The concentrating these in the same hands is precisely the definition of despotic government.
It will be no alleviation that these powers will be exercised by a plurality of hands, and not by a single one. Let those who doubt it turn their eyes on the republic of Venice.
To contend to the contrary is to falsify history. Such a falsification not only maligns the high purpose and good character of The Framers but belittles the spirit of the truly Free Man in America--the people at large of that period--who happily accepted and lived with gratification under the Constitution as their own fundamental law and under the Republic which it created, especially because they felt confident for the first time of the security of their liberties thereby protected against abuse by all possible violators, including The Majority momentarily in control of government.
The truth is that The Framers, by their protests against the "excesses of democracy," were merely making clear their sound reasons for preferring a Republic as the proper form of government.Relevant information about this document from benjaminpohle.com provides additional context.
This information is not part of the official Federal Register document. Assessment Question 1 What are the distinguishing characteristics of an executive information system (EIS)? Why have these systems become a part of business intelligence in many companies? Thanks! Can you add more unique superhero abilities that are not common to other heroes?
I’m making my own superhero story, but I have no idea what abilities to give my superhero.
Problem: What are the distinguishing characteristics of an executive information system (EIS)? Why have these systems become a part of business intelligence in many companies? Answer should be in a minimum of around words. Decisions are the heart of success and at times there are critical moments when they can be difficult, perplexing and nerve racking.
This side provides useful and practical guidance for making efficient and effective decisions in both public and private life.
Tags characteristics, distinguishing, executive, information, system Post navigation Previous Post Previous Systematic risk evaluates the probability and extent .